Markets

Built for markets that keep score in microseconds and audits

What Solieum commits to for high-frequency trading, TradFi, and real-world assets — the ordering guarantees, the audit tape, and the trade-offs named up front.

Everything on this page is design intent for markets Solieum will host — none of it is live. What exists today: the matching engine core, as a tested deterministic library in the protocol repository, and the signed ordering receipts, which the node already issues for every transaction on the devnet chain. Neither is exposed as a market yet. It is published now because market operators and trading firms should be able to judge the design before they are asked to trust it.

01Settlement classes

The decision that gates everything else

High-frequency and traditional finance are the workloads least tolerant of optimistic finality. A market maker will not treat capital as mobile behind a multi-day challenge window, and a regulated desk cannot book "probably final." So markets get settlement classes: crypto-native markets settle on the optimistic path from day one, while markets sold to HFT and TradFi users require the validity-proof class on the roadmap — proofs at commitment time, withdrawals in minutes, gated on two independent provers agreeing. Until that class is live, this page does not pretend those markets are ready.

The validity-proof path this depends on →

02HFT

Market structure for high-frequency trading

Six commitments, each of which is checkable rather than promised.

  1. 01

    The order book lives in the execution layer

    A central-limit order book as a native, deterministic matching engine — not a program fighting per-transaction compute limits, which is how on-chain books die. Integer ticks only, price-time priority stated formally, self-trade prevention named per market. And because the matcher joins the state transition itself, the proof system covers it: a matching step can be disputed and verified on Solana like any other instruction. The engine's core exists — price-time priority with an explicit admission tiebreak, good-till-cancel, immediate-or-cancel and fill-or-kill, post-only, both self-trade policies, a canonical versioned fingerprint — as a tested library. It is not yet wired to the node.

  2. 02

    Signed receipts make ordering accountable

    Every accepted order returns a signed receipt: order hash, market, batch, position, slot. Two receipts for one position — or a published batch contradicting a receipt you hold — is slashable equivocation anyone can prove. A soft confirmation stops being the operator's word and becomes an enforceable promise. The receipt mechanism is live in the node today, per transaction; the slashing that turns a proven equivocation into a penalty is not built.

  3. 03

    The ordering rule is published and checkable

    Per market, one of two rules: frequent batch auctions (uniform-price clearing per slot — ends the latency race and sandwiching by construction) or first-come-first-served with cancel priority, the market-maker protection real venues use. Either way the rule is a deterministic function of published data, so a broken promise is provable, not alleged. The node's rule today is first-come, first-served by admission; the auction variant is design.

  4. 04

    Cancels are priced for quoting

    Real quoting means ten to a hundred cancels per fill. Cancels carry a near-zero fee with anti-spam bounds, and place-and-cancel within one batch can net to almost nothing in data costs — as a per-market choice, because netting erases the audit tape that regulated markets keep.

  5. 05

    Every market is its own parallel domain

    One hot order book serialises everything that touches it. State is laid out so each market owns its own write-lock domain — parallelism across markets is structural, not aspirational.

  6. 06

    Latency claims come with percentiles

    Receipt latency is published as p50 and p99 alongside ingress locations and a fair-access policy. No microseconds marketing — the audience this page is for reads that as a warning sign, and they are right to.

03TradFi & RWA

For TradFi and real-world assets

The properties institutions actually ask about, addressed in the design rather than the sales call.

  • The data layer is an audit tape

    Planned

    With the full order lifecycle in published data, anyone can reconstruct the book at any timestamp — a consolidated-tape-style record by construction. On markets that keep the full tape, compliance gets what no general-purpose chain leads with: a complete, independently verifiable record.

  • Compliant assets on a neutral chain

    Planned

    Compliance lives in the asset, not the chain: per-asset transfer policies — allowlists, jurisdiction gates, freezes with due process that are timelocked, logged, and unable to block a proven withdrawal. Issuers get their rules; the network stays neutral.

  • Market operations are protocol events

    Planned

    Halts, market hours, opening and closing auctions, splits and dividends — scheduled state transitions, not admin scripts. And a structural-safety rule throughout: no renaming or re-denominating an instrument while live orders exist.

  • Reference prices with quarantine

    Planned

    Official marks and closes per instrument, with per-venue divergence detection that quarantines a feed rather than trading through it.

  • Order privacy, honestly priced

    Planned

    Institutions want flow privacy; published data exposes it. The menu is real and limited: encrypted-until-ordered submission, and delayed disclosure for block trades. Anything claiming "private and verifiable" without naming its mechanism is selling something.

  • Custodial backing is disclosed per asset

    Planned

    Where a tokenized instrument is backed by custodial holdings, its asset page says so — the custodian is a trust dependency, and the bridge page's disclosure discipline extends to every listed asset.

Two constraints that gate the launch

  • State growth is HFT-multiplied. Order books churn state faster than any other workload. State expiry and archival stop being a later-stage nicety and become a prerequisite for opening these markets at all.
  • Benchmarks replay real flow. Performance for this page is measured by replaying real, anonymized exchange order flow — cancel-heavy, contention-swept, reported as a curve. Synthetic transfer benchmarks describe nothing about running a market.

How performance gets reported →

What this design refuses

Named now, so nobody has to discover them later.

  • Shared or external sequencing for latency-sensitive markets at launch — it forfeits the exact latency accountability being sold above.
  • "L2 proof-of-stake validator" framing — a validator set that decides state makes this a sidechain. Decided, not merely intended: Solieum stays a rollup, and its only future validator set is a staked sequencer set that orders and never decides state.
  • Requiring a venue token to trade. Fees are SOL, and a governance token, if one is ever issued, has no fee-path role at all — ADR-0018 withdrew even the discount — because a venue whose users must first buy its token is friction sold as tokenomics.
  • Hidden order-flow preferencing of any kind. If queue position is ever purchasable, the auction is the published mechanism itself.
  • Netting on by default for markets marketed as lit or regulated — the audit tape is the product there.

Building something the base layer can't hold?

Tell us the workload. If Solieum is the wrong answer for it, we would rather say so early than have you find out at launch.